They are not - QC

Posted: May 22nd, 2016 - 3:02 pm In Reply to: Sending e-mails to us instead of overseas - ss

When a report from "global" comes into our QC bins, it has been through an MLS and a QC already. You might be shocked at the horrible quality. It's worse by far than most American MTs. And the ones I've done that haven't been through their QC yet? Un. Be. Liev. Able.

I find it impossible to believe they they are held to the same quality percentage "onshore" MLS and QCs are.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

When the Quality Compliance Team - gives an example (Views: 830, 2016-05-21, 6:27 am)
- I want to dock everyone who makes a mistake - including the supervisors. (Views: 586, 2016-05-21, 8:34 am)
  - It's cruel and we are pawns in their game until we find - a way out. (Views: 582, 2016-05-21, 9:31 am)
  - MTs are not the only ones docke - QC (Views: 522, 2016-05-22, 2:58 pm)
    - Just so you all know... - QA (Views: 547, 2016-05-25, 11:36 am)
- Sending e-mails to us instead of overseas - ss (Views: 568, 2016-05-21, 11:39 am)
  - They are not - QC
    - So if that's the case (unbelievable), then it is really true that - all they care about is cheap labor. (Views: 539, 2016-05-22, 3:39 pm)
- TSMs should be docked for every email error - Lead by example. (Views: 682, 2016-05-21, 11:49 am)