Was wondering that myself! - Nik

Posted: Feb 9th, 2016 - 7:52 pm In Reply to: Did they pull the job ad again? - Curious

Maybe they pull it after so many "dislikes." I mean, that's gotta carry some weight, right?!

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Did they pull the job ad again? - Curious (Views: 1065, 2016-02-09, 7:35 pm)
- Was wondering that myself! - Nik
- Definitely gone - XQC (Views: 778, 2016-02-09, 10:06 pm)
  - You nailed it on the second count - Glad (Views: 669, 2016-02-11, 12:28 am)
    - Who determines acceptable rates? - xxxx (Views: 620, 2016-02-11, 8:29 am)
      - Minimum wage - sickened (Views: 586, 2016-02-11, 9:32 am)
        Nor did I say that .... - xxxx (Views: 591, 2016-02-11, 11:06 am)
        No one said they were not compliant with the law - but it is a pretty big deal to advertise here (Views: 664, 2016-02-11, 2:37 pm)
        and for once, this is truly "exciting news!" NM - Glad (Views: 604, 2016-02-11, 2:56 pm)
      - MT Stars does - I draw your attention to top of page - on Job Seeker Board (Views: 648, 2016-02-11, 9:33 am)
      - Kudos to MT Stars for taking a minimum stand. I applied for several jobs and - sm (Views: 656, 2016-02-11, 10:25 am)
      - Comply yes, but if they are forced to add - makeup pay to meet min wage (Views: 580, 2016-02-11, 4:14 pm)
- They also seem to have lost their featured spot - at the top of the page. They must (Views: 687, 2016-02-11, 4:15 pm)
  - Oh snap! - XQC (Views: 554, 2016-02-11, 4:55 pm)
  - Fantastic! - wordie (Views: 623, 2016-02-11, 6:37 pm)