[ In Reply To ..]
I have researched this, but what I get on an online search is sketchy. Stedman's only has "cholelith" without giving the plural form.
But thanks for you suggestion!
I think you're safe using "choleliths". (nm) - Hi there!
[ In Reply To ..]
Probably a holdover from the doc being educated outside the U.S.; I see an Aussie surgery site with that spelling. :-)
Think about it this way - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
Since cholelith is in Stedman's and a plural is not given, it is perfectly acceptable to type choleliths as the plural. They don't give plurals for English words. You aren't going to find veins listed in Stedman's as a plural of vein, because it is an English word, and the standard plural form is veins.
Other words that end in -lith, i.e., tonsilith, have the "s" added on the end for the plural form.
[ In Reply To ..]
Every reference I checked for cholelith either redirected me to gallstone or found no entry. I think it may still be evolving as a word. I would suggest using choleliths.
Thank you Hi There! and Wymania - TxMT
[ In Reply To ..]
Yes, when I google "choleliths," the hits I get aren't what I'd call "reliable." Where I work we are told to only trust legitimate sites and just because you get hits on your search, doesn't mean it's right to use in a medicolegal sense.
The first hit is singular and through Wikipedia, second refers back to gallstones, third is Merck, a veterinary site. I am transcribing for humans, not animals. The next two refer to the singular form or cholelithiasis. The next refers to choleliths in a cat. And so on and so forth. Just so those of you out there don't think I didn't research this myself first.
I was reaching out to hopefully hit upon someone who had more knowledge of this than what I was coming up with. But I truly did try for myself first!
Also, when searching a word online, you may notice the way you typed the word to do the search listed as such in the site description, but once into the document/website, it isn't used that way at all. I don't just go by a listing of hits, I also read through the material on the website to confirm it is correct or to enhance my search further.
I have suggested referrels to either Dr.s' A/B (Swedish), Dr.s'C /D (University of Colorado), or the Barrow Neurologic Institute.
I changed the names for this question. Wondering on any advice for how to type that? ...
Family history is positive with mother and father having *history* of diabetes.
This is how the doctor dictates it. Should it be *histories* ??
I have the freedom correct things like this if I see fit. Thanks! ...
Can someone tell me if genitalia is considered plural? Would I put "genitalia WERE prepped and draped," or "genitalia WAS prepped and draped"? thanks! ...
QA changed "bilateral upper extremities radiculopathy" to "bilateral upper extremity radiculopathy"
Shouldn't it be "extremities" since bilateral is plural? I know it's easier to SAY "bilateral upper extremity radiculopathy" but isn't that grammatically incorrect?
...
Plural form of retina. Is it retinae? Or retinas? I find both when I google it, but nothing in my word book or dictionary stating the plural form.
Thank you! ...
Please help: What is the correct use of the word paresthesia? Is there a
proper plural to this word? I see different things in different dictionaries.
I am a VR transcriptionist, and many of my providers use paresthesias when
referring to a single area of the body. Comments appreciated.
Emily (Silverfox) ...