Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

I wasn’t working for you - Not Necessarily True

Posted: Oct 2nd, 2022 - 10:47 pm In Reply to: Continue scoring low then - KKQ

And you weren’t in my workplace. I was there so I ought to know what happened and I’m not making things up, Ms. Know-It-All.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Being charged for inaccuracies - KKQ (Views: 1080, 2022-09-27, 2:09 pm)
- HAHAHAHA! - chillywinter (Views: 662, 2022-09-27, 3:07 pm)
  - HAHAHAHA - Probably a suit (Views: 875, 2022-09-27, 3:46 pm)
- The deduction offers incentive - You have got to be kidding (Views: 699, 2022-09-27, 3:49 pm)
- Charged for inaccuricies - I have a feeling (Views: 715, 2022-09-27, 3:52 pm)
  - Not a suit...an employee - KKQ (Views: 611, 2022-09-29, 9:00 am)
    - Yep… - Chillywinter (Views: 564, 2022-09-29, 9:47 am)
- KKQ - Not necessarily true (Views: 644, 2022-10-02, 12:02 pm)
  - Continue scoring low then - KKQ (Views: 574, 2022-10-02, 7:36 pm)
    - I wasn’t working for you - Not Necessarily True
- right - MT Mama (Views: 488, 2022-11-09, 2:38 pm)