Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Top Viewed:

I've been experiencing the running out for years now - sm

Posted: Jan 6th, 2022 - 12:20 pm In Reply to: Are there any companies that have work that does not run out ?? - xx

I have so many companies that I have not put on my resume due to the fact that employment was only for a couple, three weeks or so. I would start the job, get some good lines, then there would be no work within a matter of weeks. The job I'm at now is experiencing low work, but I've been with this company for six years or so now and have another account that I do with another company as backup (just acquired in the last five or six months). I'm not sure what companies actually do have work though as the ones that I previously worked for said they did but didn't. I would get emails about jobs that needed to be typed on my days off asking me to get on to work, but there was never much there then either. Like they wanted someone to type one job and emailed 15 people about it. I'm hoping that I can withstand what I have until I retire, which is still a few more years ahead of me. I wish there were other options, but it seems a lot of these companies overhire and then there are people sitting around waiting for work on a daily basis.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Are there any companies that have work that does not run out ?? - xx (Views: 785, 2022-01-06, 1:03 am)
- Yeah, there is. Every time I have posted that, I have been - ruthlessly attacked. Do your own (Views: 761, 2022-01-06, 11:20 am)
  - I hear you. That person is relentless with the board monitoring - sm (Views: 987, 2022-01-06, 12:28 pm)
    - Exactly... - xx (Views: 668, 2022-01-06, 1:27 pm)
      - Seems you understood the context of the post - bravo! sm (Views: 644, 2022-01-06, 10:57 pm)
    - Calling a company is no more stupid than you attacking - someone, and then say others on this board (Views: 733, 2022-01-06, 5:50 pm)
      - Sure! They wouldn't tell you they had very little work. - sm (Views: 676, 2022-01-06, 6:52 pm)
        Nope that is all you Dominatrix. YOU are the one telling - poster what they should or should not (Views: 471, 2022-01-06, 8:12 pm)
        No one told anyone what to do. It stands to reason - that a company, sm (Views: 548, 2022-01-06, 10:46 pm)
        Yes - you exhibit way too much psychology with no expertise - and it is not needed. Figures you would (Views: 521, 2022-01-07, 12:57 pm)
        Look who's talking about dominating every thread! - sm (Views: 631, 2022-01-08, 8:02 am)
        "News flash Bossy." None of us need your instructions - nm (Views: 678, 2022-01-08, 8:38 am)
        Nor yours - // Pot.kettle.Black (Views: 570, 2022-01-08, 12:30 pm)
        Nor yours - // Pot.kettle.Black - sm (Views: 404, 2022-01-08, 1:45 pm)
        Get help yourself. You let others live in your head rent free - What an easy mark. No originality on your part (Views: 598, 2022-01-08, 7:58 pm)
        Yeah, sounds exactly like Definition of bully: - sm (Views: 418, 2022-01-08, 8:57 pm)
        ^^Nope. Webster's has a picture of you next - to the word bully. Please update your head shot^^ (Views: 612, 2022-01-08, 9:24 pm)
        Try Websters for insecurity, - sm (Views: 455, 2022-01-09, 10:16 am)
        ^^You beat evryone to it to have you picture posted - there, too^^ (Views: 704, 2022-01-09, 12:05 pm)
        Thanks! - stokleygary@gmail.com (Views: 987, 2022-11-29, 9:18 am)
        New flash. No one gives a flying rats a*s - whom you (Views: 600, 2022-01-06, 8:18 pm)
        I'm very surprised to see that the person on the company - pointing out mistakes, sm (Views: 617, 2022-01-06, 10:48 pm)
        No one gives a rat's a*s whom you monitor, where did you read - that? sm (Views: 541, 2022-01-06, 11:16 pm)
        If you cannot follow a thread, that's your problem. - The Dominatrix clearly states monitoring (Views: 571, 2022-01-07, 12:59 pm)
        The poster said none of that. Learn to read - sm (Views: 458, 2022-01-08, 7:57 am)
        Contact the Literacy Council in your area. - Wow, just wow, wow, wow, wow. (Views: 647, 2022-01-08, 12:31 pm)
        Company Board Inspector, Contact the posting guidelines - sm (Views: 556, 2022-01-08, 2:29 pm)
        Nice try on your lies about what was posted. Shows your - racism, no one elses (Views: 561, 2022-01-08, 8:02 pm)
        How is any of this racist - Pease explain (Views: 432, 2022-01-09, 11:07 am)
        Which Dominatrix you talking about? I see several! - nm (Views: 647, 2022-01-08, 8:47 am)
        I pasted what that poster actually said for you, because they did not - say she knows who posts, sm (Views: 612, 2022-01-08, 9:13 am)
        Wow, just wow, wow, wow, wow - You still cannot get threads straight (Views: 495, 2022-01-08, 12:34 pm)
        You spend way to much time talking gibberish trying to make sure you're right - about something, nm (Views: 528, 2022-01-08, 1:59 pm)
        ^^And you're right about nothing. Take your own advise - get help.^^ (Views: 465, 2022-01-08, 7:59 pm)
        I'd advise you to take your own advice. Where's that English inspector? - nm (Views: 525, 2022-01-08, 9:00 pm)
        ^^Wow, just wow. Got that mirror out again, and you - seem to be gazing into it nonstop^^ (Views: 423, 2022-01-08, 9:25 pm)
        I didn't see any command in the post telling anyone what to do - some of these posts (Views: 435, 2022-01-06, 10:03 pm)
      - Everyone has their own opinion, if one feels calling a company - would be stupid, sm (Views: 526, 2022-01-06, 10:42 pm)
  - Just a question....xx - xx (Views: 491, 2022-01-06, 1:24 pm)
    - Only one bent seems to be you. - Grow up (Views: 562, 2022-01-06, 4:23 pm)
    - I agree. You hit the nail on the head! - nm (Views: 492, 2022-01-08, 8:49 am)
      - Only one needing hit in the head would be the poster - stalking and harassing, maybe you? (Views: 529, 2022-01-08, 12:37 pm)
        maybe you writing to yourself again? - nm (Views: 469, 2022-01-08, 2:06 pm)
        ^^Nahhhh, again, that's all you Sybil^^ - Guess you missed Dr. Phil today (Views: 518, 2022-01-08, 8:08 pm)
  - Yeah, a lot of attacking goes on in these posts - sm (Views: 478, 2022-01-06, 9:57 pm)
    - Clearly, you have a comprehension problem about what is posted - I never said I was attacked for asking (Views: 671, 2022-01-07, 1:03 pm)
      - Oh, didn't realize you were giving instruction to the OP - sm (Views: 478, 2022-01-08, 8:22 am)
        Yes, try to follow what is going on. - I know you have difficulty, but you can do it (Views: 487, 2022-01-08, 12:36 pm)
        Apparently we can't all have steller posts such as yours - nm (Views: 484, 2022-01-08, 2:02 pm)
        No, but we know how to spell stellar - An observation (Views: 411, 2022-01-08, 2:07 pm)
        Great to see the company board English inspector on board here - sm (Views: 546, 2022-01-08, 2:09 pm)
        Yeah -we get it. The truth is more than you can handle - wow, just, wow, wow. (Views: 379, 2022-01-08, 8:04 pm)
  - big discussion below about telling posters what they should - or should not do, good read, sm (Views: 497, 2022-01-08, 9:42 am)
    - Yeah there is. Seems you want to stir the pot rather - than actually contribute anything usefel (Views: 517, 2022-01-08, 12:39 pm)
      - Seems you in on the stir! - nm (Views: 519, 2022-01-08, 2:04 pm)
      - ^Nope that's all you dear^ - Send an address where I can send your spatulas. (Views: 456, 2022-01-08, 8:06 pm)
- I've been experiencing the running out for years now - sm
- Yes. - sleepymt (Views: 670, 2022-01-06, 8:36 pm)
- I will attempt to answer - Ex-MT (Views: 641, 2022-01-09, 11:28 am)
- Rudeness is overbearing here! - Former MT (Views: 464, 2022-01-18, 2:10 pm)