Today's Top Viewed:

Because it does no good to complain to the admin - of the FB page, and...

Posted: Feb 21st, 2020 - 4:36 pm In Reply to: Why would someone go to an MT FB page - and come here and

because it's a free country, lol. Go away.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Isn't posting a patient's name a HIPAA violation? - nm (Views: 632, 2020-02-20, 5:21 pm)
- Yes it is - MT67 (Views: 506, 2020-02-20, 5:24 pm)
  - I thought so, thanks! - nm (Views: 581, 2020-02-20, 5:28 pm)
- Sure is - SM (Views: 697, 2020-02-20, 6:27 pm)
  - Yes! That is exactly what I was referring to. I thought - maybe I have missed (Views: 711, 2020-02-20, 8:47 pm)
  - Maybe a couple of names were patients - Old Anon. SM (Views: 607, 2020-02-21, 6:46 am)
    - No one said they didn't like the page - The question was about HIPAA (Views: 420, 2020-02-21, 7:44 am)
      - And my point was, there was NO - HIPAA violation (Views: 601, 2020-02-21, 9:25 am)
        Then pray tell - SM (Views: 461, 2020-02-21, 12:39 pm)
        Why would someone go to an MT FB page - and come here and (Views: 334, 2020-02-21, 3:21 pm)
        Because it does no good to complain to the admin - of the FB page, and...
        LOL. Go Away? - Have I been suddenly (Views: 479, 2020-02-21, 5:32 pm)
        Not middle school but some of you sure seem to think you're - transported to a top management position SM (Views: 299, 2020-02-22, 9:23 am)
        Nobody has ordered you not to post. Just - saying how misguided (Views: 305, 2020-02-23, 8:05 am)
    - Yeah, all the first names were UNIQUE. That was - the point NM (Views: 437, 2020-02-21, 8:32 am)
      - There were a few unique first names which - spanned a number (Views: 764, 2020-02-21, 3:24 pm)
        Think of "what if" one of those unusual names were on here or - a friend/relative of theirs be here. SM (Views: 293, 2020-02-22, 11:59 am)
        I agree - It is a HIPAA violation. (Views: 271, 2020-02-23, 2:04 pm)