Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

NOS - levette

Posted: Dec 21st, 2018 - 5:36 pm In Reply to: mets - former Andrews student/grad

I thought malignant neoplasm not otherwise specified was referring to, for example, the retroperitoneal carcinoma example where it's not specified as primary or secondary. It seems awkwardly written. It would make more sense if it said "metastatic malignant neoplasm not otherwise specified."

I coded C48.0 for "retroperitoneal carcimoma" and C78.6 is considered the correct answer. I do wonder why the C80.1 wasn't coded, probably an oversight.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Looking for help with an actual coding question :) - levette (Views: 650, 2018-12-13, 10:45 pm)
- Coding clinic - Not perfect but trying (Views: 463, 2018-12-14, 8:11 am)
  - guidelines - levette (Views: 422, 2018-12-14, 3:34 pm)
    - ICD-10 Guidelines - Coder74 (Views: 354, 2018-12-19, 6:28 am)
    - Coding Clinic - former Andrews student/grad (Views: 533, 2018-12-19, 9:03 pm)
- AHA Coding Handbook - former Andrews student/grad (Views: 485, 2018-12-19, 8:55 pm)
  - doesn't need to be stated metastatic? - levette (Views: 472, 2018-12-20, 11:27 am)
    - Brain cancer or brain mets - former Andrews student/grad (Views: 381, 2018-12-20, 3:41 pm)
      - Not stated metastatic - levette (Views: 366, 2018-12-20, 8:40 pm)
        Mets - former Andrews student/grad (Views: 432, 2018-12-20, 9:47 pm)
        guideline - levette (Views: 496, 2018-12-21, 8:21 am)
        mets - former Andrews student/grad (Views: 491, 2018-12-21, 12:49 pm)
        NOS - levette
        NOS vs METS - former Andrews student/grad (Views: 460, 2018-12-22, 4:18 pm)