Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Nuance still the holder of the contracts, so. . . - anon

Posted: May 20th, 2018 - 3:56 pm In Reply to: When you say the tax changes have made - offshoring less attractive financially

They have to have backup in place, either US or offshore, in case one or more of these MTSOs doesn't make it long-term. Nuance is ultimately responsible for ensuring contract terms are met, because the contract is between Nuance and said hospital/facility. So they can't burn all their bridge, just in case.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

I'm curious to know whether all these new named MTSO - KAT (Views: 891, 2018-05-19, 10:47 am)
- They are using the same platforms because - See Message (Views: 605, 2018-05-19, 4:45 pm)
  - Exactly. . . for a couple reasons - anon (Views: 558, 2018-05-20, 6:14 am)
    - When you say the tax changes have made - offshoring less attractive financially (Views: 656, 2018-05-20, 8:52 am)
      - Nuance still the holder of the contracts, so. . . - anon
        So I guess in this metaphor - we are the bridges (Views: 405, 2018-05-20, 5:34 pm)