A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
This is one of the endless list of reasons why I get so fed up with Benchmark and so called "rules". Forever I was always taught to write out numbers 1-10 in text; but then Benchmark guidelines (and MQ followed thereafter) that we were to use numeric nomenclature; that is unless the two (or is it 2) numbers appeared next to each other. So all you 300 lph people who say they are 100% accurate on their reports, what IS the correct way now? I just got through with a report that if I had not been my usual ultra-edit conscious self and ever diligent, there would have been many glaring errors left that someone going that fast on at 300 lph would not have caught. That is my opinion on this. I will continue to edit (I used to be the Senior Editor of a major publication company by the way, so I am extremely nitpicky) my documents and research them, as I take pride in my work and the satisfaction that I am delivering a document for which the patient will not be compromised.
So, back to my original request. I took Benchmark off my computer, so I cannot look it up. Did the rule go back to the old way of numbering?