A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
Is it because of the work availability on accounts.....meaning there is not enough regular work coming in from them individually to warrant "a primary account or a primary MT?" Is it because of client specs for different accounts? Does it matter whether it is clinic work or hospital work? Is it because they could put all of these accounts on the same platform? I really do not get this.
I am not on a POD. I work on Charnet. I have a primary account, and 2 backup accounts. I am not sure how long I will last here (been 2 years now), but I stay because of the benefits, my shift, pretty regular work, and great management working directly over me. The account specs are a little tricky, and we also have some dictators from H#!!
Are the PODS a test? Do they expect to lose those accounts anyway? It seems to me that it is a "no-brainer" that if MTs work the same account(s) day in and day out, it would improve production, TAT, employees working assigned shifts, and above all, the accuracy and quality of reports. Everyone knows that - so why would a company who claims these things are so important undermine their own success in this way? If the unreasonable accuracy requirements didn't get rid of enough MTs, this surely will. What will they do then?
Are there any MTs out there doing well on the PODS? Seems there is plenty of work for everyone, even OT. Is it working out for anyone? For the company? Can MM claim this is successful yet? Afraid I would not be able to do it. Most of my MT's success is because I am so familiar with account/speciality/same doctors/and specs.