A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
Recently a guy from the state called asking if the MTSO regularly "corrects" MT work. The answer is... what is the answer?
I mean, an MT corrects their own work, to the best of their ability. If you get stumped on some bad audio or weird name or medication or medical term and Google fails, Word Help board fails, you send it to QA, and they try to fill in the final blanks.
But is that really "correction"? Because the MT (if they aren't slacking and/or incompetent) knew they didn't know, and sent it to QA not to correct mistakes they made, but to fill in blanks they left/double-check their best guesses.
And the MT gets back a completed version showing what the "correct" answers were. But I don't feel if it was me, that I'd have been "corrected;" it's more like you're getting instructional feedback from QA so that next time you hear that term, you're golden.
But the state seems to consider it "correction" for purposes of determining IC status vs. employee. Is that fair?