Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Look at gg's posts who already - acknowledge that

Posted: Nov 17th, 2019 - 6:16 am In Reply to: lol - sm

he/she was trying to document GT and actually found a reference after I suggested that it stood for G-tube or gastrostomy tube. Your post was a day late and a dollar short because the OP already had the answer. My handle is Old Anon and have been transcribing for over 40 years and have never come across meds being administered by NG-tube. In any event, the OP had already found his/her reference/answer when you popped in with your improbable answer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

meds - gg (Views: 644, 2019-11-12, 5:52 pm)
- Can you tell from the rest of the note if... - Old Anon (Views: 425, 2019-11-13, 3:40 am)
  - meds - gg (Views: 424, 2019-11-13, 4:40 pm)
    - My Stedman's Abbreviations Reference - Old Anon (Views: 411, 2019-11-14, 4:35 am)
      - meds - gg (Views: 444, 2019-11-14, 5:06 pm)
        You are very welcome. - Old Anon (Views: 362, 2019-11-15, 5:34 am)
- Could be NGT (nasogastric tube) - nm (Views: 342, 2019-11-14, 10:59 am)
  - Did you even read the original post... - It said 1500 mg GT. (Views: 463, 2019-11-14, 1:21 pm)
    - lol - sm (Views: 393, 2019-11-16, 1:20 pm)
      - Look at gg's posts who already - acknowledge that
        I do not dispute your confirming of GT... - sm (Views: 453, 2019-11-17, 1:41 pm)
        No, I took umbrage at your lol and - 4 enumerated points (Views: 391, 2019-11-17, 3:04 pm)
        In response to: "Did you even read the original post." - It is a help board. (Views: 388, 2019-11-18, 7:39 am)
        And what is your point? - It was a disagreement (Views: 402, 2019-11-18, 1:37 pm)
      - Oh, but you may be wrong because - meds can be admind (Views: 385, 2019-11-17, 6:34 am)