Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Top Viewed:

bonus pay conflicting dates??? - ann

Posted: Oct 31st, 2017 - 12:56 pm In Reply to: Wup, wup, wup! 40 hours in period 6/26-7/8. - Still, that is something like 13 days,

My email refers to the incentive put out for 06/26 to 07/14 incentive pay "and bonus" offered during those dates.

The next paragraph says you get the 1000 if you worked 40 hours between 06/26 and 07/8 regardless of whether it was consecutive or not.

I qualified for the first but not the second! The original offer was to work 40 hours in 5 consecutive days once you were able to get back on. What are they are up to now??

I emailed HR about this.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Bonus pay, another oops? Confused based on - email received today regarding (Views: 1370, 2017-10-31, 11:14 am)
- I am wondering same thing. I had the required - 40 hours based on this new (Views: 935, 2017-10-31, 11:54 am)
- Bonus pay - SpentMT (Views: 987, 2017-10-31, 12:02 pm)
- I also had at least 40 hours during revised time - period and did not receive (Views: 1037, 2017-10-31, 12:18 pm)
- Wup, wup, wup! 40 hours in period 6/26-7/8. - Still, that is something like 13 days, (Views: 1047, 2017-10-31, 12:46 pm)
  - bonus pay conflicting dates??? - ann
    - Yep. Whole thing is odd and raises flat. Why is - this update just being released now (Views: 1288, 2017-10-31, 2:19 pm)
- Sure looks like ANOTHER miscommunication. - Bonus money was not processed on this (Views: 1020, 2017-10-31, 2:26 pm)
- Was just coming here to see if anyone thought the - same thing. Odd too that lines uploaded (Views: 889, 2017-10-31, 2:28 pm)
- Is there a way to check back that far - in webclock? (Views: 794, 2017-10-31, 2:40 pm)
  - It looks like you cannot go back that far for - time sheets. That would figure right? (Views: 844, 2017-10-31, 2:47 pm)
  - Check your hours on your paystubs in ADP! - nm (Views: 566, 2017-11-02, 2:03 pm)
- Cannot understand how email dated 10/31 announces - decision to revise, yet states all (Views: 1224, 2017-10-31, 3:13 pm)
  - My reply to Mr. Clark (it's long, get ready) - nm (Views: 1483, 2017-10-31, 3:36 pm)
    - You should post this letter on the Nuance Investors Board - nm (Views: 815, 2017-10-31, 6:35 pm)
    - Please post this on the Nuance investors board, - lynlou (Views: 905, 2017-10-31, 8:53 pm)
      - letter to M. Clark - kathleenkeane (Views: 1085, 2017-11-02, 12:07 am)
        You have done a great thing. Thank you. - lynlou (Views: 908, 2017-11-02, 6:14 am)
    - (it's long, get ready) - ex-Nuancer (Views: 1050, 2017-10-31, 9:50 pm)
      - ex-Nuancer - signals cockers (Views: 832, 2017-11-08, 4:28 am)
- I emaied HR shortly after the email and to my - surprise NOT crickets again. (Views: 923, 2017-10-31, 3:24 pm)
  - I also emailed about 20 minutes after the email - was received and not a word in response. (Views: 755, 2017-11-01, 10:28 am)
- Still no reply to my email sent 24 hours ago. - Anybody else send email and get reply? (Views: 679, 2017-11-02, 10:34 am)
  - No reply here either. I really did not expect one - based on history, but still (Views: 764, 2017-11-02, 10:59 am)