Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Top Viewed:

Wup, wup, wup! 40 hours in period 6/26-7/8. - Still, that is something like 13 days,

Posted: Oct 31st, 2017 - 12:46 pm In Reply to: Bonus pay, another oops? Confused based on - email received today regarding

and they do not have to be consecutive.

And note this: "As of Friday, October 27, 2017, all Incentive and Bonus payments have been received by all eligible MLS."

I work part time and will go check my hours just in case of a mistake as it must be close over those 13 days, but no happy surprises received and don't expect any.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Bonus pay, another oops? Confused based on - email received today regarding (Views: 1315, 2017-10-31, 11:14 am)
- I am wondering same thing. I had the required - 40 hours based on this new (Views: 864, 2017-10-31, 11:54 am)
- Bonus pay - SpentMT (Views: 907, 2017-10-31, 12:02 pm)
- I also had at least 40 hours during revised time - period and did not receive (Views: 970, 2017-10-31, 12:18 pm)
- Wup, wup, wup! 40 hours in period 6/26-7/8. - Still, that is something like 13 days,
  - bonus pay conflicting dates??? - ann (Views: 867, 2017-10-31, 12:56 pm)
    - Yep. Whole thing is odd and raises flat. Why is - this update just being released now (Views: 1197, 2017-10-31, 2:19 pm)
- Sure looks like ANOTHER miscommunication. - Bonus money was not processed on this (Views: 958, 2017-10-31, 2:26 pm)
- Was just coming here to see if anyone thought the - same thing. Odd too that lines uploaded (Views: 839, 2017-10-31, 2:28 pm)
- Is there a way to check back that far - in webclock? (Views: 731, 2017-10-31, 2:40 pm)
  - It looks like you cannot go back that far for - time sheets. That would figure right? (Views: 790, 2017-10-31, 2:47 pm)
  - Check your hours on your paystubs in ADP! - nm (Views: 517, 2017-11-02, 2:03 pm)
- Cannot understand how email dated 10/31 announces - decision to revise, yet states all (Views: 1172, 2017-10-31, 3:13 pm)
  - My reply to Mr. Clark (it's long, get ready) - nm (Views: 1366, 2017-10-31, 3:36 pm)
    - You should post this letter on the Nuance Investors Board - nm (Views: 757, 2017-10-31, 6:35 pm)
    - Please post this on the Nuance investors board, - lynlou (Views: 828, 2017-10-31, 8:53 pm)
      - letter to M. Clark - kathleenkeane (Views: 1033, 2017-11-02, 12:07 am)
        You have done a great thing. Thank you. - lynlou (Views: 839, 2017-11-02, 6:14 am)
    - (it's long, get ready) - ex-Nuancer (Views: 1001, 2017-10-31, 9:50 pm)
      - ex-Nuancer - signals cockers (Views: 779, 2017-11-08, 4:28 am)
- I emaied HR shortly after the email and to my - surprise NOT crickets again. (Views: 864, 2017-10-31, 3:24 pm)
  - I also emailed about 20 minutes after the email - was received and not a word in response. (Views: 700, 2017-11-01, 10:28 am)
- Still no reply to my email sent 24 hours ago. - Anybody else send email and get reply? (Views: 612, 2017-11-02, 10:34 am)
  - No reply here either. I really did not expect one - based on history, but still (Views: 657, 2017-11-02, 10:59 am)