Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

New transcriptionist - Stormy

Posted: Sep 10th, 2017 - 10:44 am In Reply to: Many MTSOs - xx

Thank you for your response. These were my sentiments too, but she really needs something to do from home and has 30 years of experience as a Radiology Tech. I, too, believe it will be too much sugar for a dime. I made pretty good money when I worked from home, as I typed 120 WPM, but I worked irregular hours, all night long sometime, missed lots of family gatherings, etc., as you all know; HOWEVER, I raised my babies up around my feet while I did it and it was well worth it for me! She just has to decide for herself and see if it will be worth it for her situation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

New transcriptionist - Ilene Graebner (Views: 1236, 2017-09-07, 3:10 pm)
- To Ilene - Before you post here, you should (Views: 926, 2017-09-07, 4:59 pm)
  - New transcriptionist - Stormy (Views: 834, 2017-09-10, 10:30 am)
- Nuance is probably hiring - Jellybean (Views: 853, 2017-09-07, 5:44 pm)
  - Newbie - Ilene Graebner (Views: 806, 2017-09-07, 5:54 pm)
    - No Californians - Jellybean (Views: 745, 2017-09-07, 6:12 pm)
      - It sure does! I was one of the CA MTs laid off - 1 month shy of a year ago (Views: 873, 2017-09-07, 6:59 pm)
        What bothers me - Jellybean (Views: 856, 2017-09-07, 7:18 pm)
        In-house jobs which are far and few between do - actually pay at that range. (Views: 687, 2017-09-07, 8:09 pm)
        But in the meantime, we are paid poverty - wages and held to (Views: 605, 2017-09-07, 10:19 pm)
        IMO, labor friendly laws were the deciding factors. - Nuancer. sm (Views: 658, 2017-09-08, 1:21 pm)
      - No Californians? - Ilene Graebner (Views: 713, 2017-09-07, 11:16 pm)
        Many MTSOs - xx (Views: 852, 2017-09-08, 7:04 am)
        New transcriptionist - Stormy
        Um, okay. - xx (Views: 783, 2017-09-10, 2:34 pm)
        Because - see message (Views: 593, 2017-09-09, 4:58 pm)