A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
Is it correct to say "there was stigmata of bleeding?" I am conflicted as to whether from one site it is possible to have stigmata of bleeding. Does stigmata of bleeding infer that there is bleeding from multiple sites? Would "there were stigmata of bleeding" or "there was stigma of bleeding" be more correct?
(Obviously it is neccesary to understand that stigma is the singular and stigmata is the plural...)
Thanks in advance for your help with this!