A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
Although my view on this issue is that, yes, a seasoned transcriptionist should recognize that 216 was not the proper value (and I can see QA flagging that as a serious error), the point I'd like to make is that this is the crazy problem with MTSOs thinking that ASR can replace the human, experienced transcriptionist.
Without an MT's knowledge that "this value" or "that dosage" doesn't make sense, this is exactly the type of error that ASR will continue to crank out. The question is: How much do the MTSOs feel that knowledge is worth? Apparently, 4 cents per line. Well, you get what you pay for!
I don't see how they could ever completely elminate the need for editors; and yet, expecting those editors to have the training and knowledge to catch errors like this while paying them what could be as low as minimum wage reveals a total lack of fairness and common sense.
When working as an MT, I tried to constantly process what was being said (rather than just mechanically matching the words I saw with what I heard) and catch every discrepancy and error in what the doctors were dictating; but in order to do that, even with 18 years of experience, there was no way I could do it fast enough to make the hourly wage that that effort was worth.
My QA scores were consistently 99.5% to 100%, but I couldn't earn a fair wage by keeping up that kind of quality. This is one of the reasons I got out of this business, and they lost an excellent transcriptionist when I did, if I may say so myself! (LOL) No one goes to the grocery store and expects to pay hamburger prices for filet mignon, and yet that's what the MTSO seem to be expecting.