You're changing the literal meaning. Pus-*like* is not the same as containing pus, - which is what *pussy* means. nm Posted: May 19th, 2020 - 2:52 pm In Reply to: pus-like - AJ
If you would make it a "pus-containing" wound, e.g., at least that would be closer to the actual meaning. But I still disagree with using anything but the word "pussy" when it's dictated that way.
"Pussy" in this context is not slang like pee-pee or doo-doo, so not comparable. The only issue is that it is similar to *another* slang word, not that the word itself is slang.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
- spelling - madmissy (Views: 707, 2020-05-13, 8:10 pm)
- Pus-like - StillAnMT (Views: 553, 2020-05-14, 7:47 am)
- Correct! - Anon (Views: 407, 2020-05-19, 1:40 pm)
- I was also told to change it to pus-like - Anon (Views: 596, 2020-05-14, 8:08 am)
- pus-like - AJ (Views: 549, 2020-05-19, 1:38 pm)
- You're changing the literal meaning. Pus-*like* is not the same as containing pus, - which is what *pussy* means. nm
|
