This and that - roseisrose

Haven't visited this site for a while so maybe the subject has been discussed to death, but:  Is it within the realm of possibility to unify account specifics among providers/MTSOs?  My main account went back to on-site transcription (yay for them!).  A new account was assigned, basically clinic and outpatient care; easy-peasy work, BUT the account specifics are 15+ pages long.  IMHO, this is totally unnecessary, yet for the past 25 years, I've seen clients' wants increase to a ridiculous level.  C'mon, folks.  Yeah, avoiding dangerous abbreviations is a must as are a few (very) other items.  But "3 to 4" vs "3-4", capitalized (or not) departments, "times 3," "x 3" or "x3"?  Anything other than what's in the Book of Style or an MTSO's standard is, again IMO, excess.  

Okay, that is all; as you were.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

• This and that - roseisrose (Views: 1398, 2017-12-14, 10:39 pm)
  • It's ridiculous that the medical record format hasn't - been completely standardized. (Views: 815, 2017-12-15, 6:57 am)
    • Agree it is a power issue - MT (Views: 812, 2017-12-15, 8:54 am)
  • Proprietary Standardization - zm (Views: 764, 2017-12-15, 8:51 am)
  • Specs and client requirements - sm (Views: 766, 2017-12-15, 8:55 am)

• Latest Posts
• Unanswered
• Top Viewed
• Most Discussed
• Most Liked