Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

I don't think working for MTSOs outsourcing - jpppp

Posted: Dec 5th, 2017 - 1:41 pm In Reply to: So right! You know what's going on today! - The tide is turning

will ever get better. The big MTSOs outsourcing their work are controlling the market and the smaller MTSOs who are literally working for those big MTSOs now. They're not independent companies anymore, they're governed by Nuance and others.

I work for one company that sends us threatening emails daily about how we could lose accounts to other MTSOs, but they have so many MTs working on these accounts to meet TATs that it's almost impossible to learn an account accurately anymore.

They have to have 30 MTs on one medium acute care account to keep the workload down or else they miss TAT and thus threats from Nuance/others about losing the accounts.

We're all working as ICs so no one works a schedule anymore, and it's impossible for the outsource companies to manage these accounts without overhiring.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

MT Coalition: Dump your eleven demands. Prove that you - can accomplish ONE thing. (Views: 1925, 2017-12-05, 3:32 am)
- I have one issue with your scenario. - NTSMT (Views: 1160, 2017-12-05, 8:14 am)
- You won't get support here, not the right place - sm (Views: 1071, 2017-12-05, 9:01 am)
  - So right! You know what's going on today! - The tide is turning (Views: 1034, 2017-12-05, 9:33 am)
    - NOBODY has addressed... - Regional (Views: 1100, 2017-12-05, 11:35 am)
    - My last IC gig - Haha (Views: 963, 2017-12-05, 11:50 am)
    - I don't think working for MTSOs outsourcing - jpppp
  - Butt Talk. - YouAre (Views: 928, 2017-12-05, 11:38 am)
  - We might all see the MT landscape differently but my point remains: - Tackle ONE thing, not ELEVEN. (Views: 953, 2017-12-05, 11:52 am)
    - .. and you are SPOT ON! - ButtTalk (Views: 929, 2017-12-05, 12:15 pm)
- MT Coalition ignoring this - thread (Views: 1547, 2017-12-05, 2:18 pm)
  - Because I didn't see the thread - MTs for Change (Views: 923, 2017-12-06, 2:57 am)
    - And your response to the OP is... - what?-nm (Views: 785, 2017-12-06, 12:12 pm)
- The MT Coaliation lady is NOT - Qualified (Views: 748, 2017-12-06, 2:07 pm)