Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Top Viewed:

Agree - worked on both platforms also and prefer Escription - MT

Posted: Jun 30th, 2017 - 5:19 pm In Reply to: Fluency - Vin

For me, Fluency was MUCH more time-consuming. More demographic hoops to jump through (all unpaid of course), took longer to get into document, and then cumbersome heading protocols.

It's much faster with both Escription and Emdat.

Fluency had better research tools, though.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Did you see the MM post on the Main Board here wanting - sm (Views: 1048, 2017-06-30, 9:11 am)
- Also posted on Job Seeker's board. - nm (Views: 637, 2017-06-30, 9:13 am)
  - Temporary work from Nuance I suppose. - They are not back up yet. (Views: 831, 2017-06-30, 9:14 am)
    - Notice how its only IC - So you are done when Nuance is back up (Views: 774, 2017-06-30, 9:24 am)
      - Dont count on it being temporary because I fully expect some - MT2 (Views: 894, 2017-06-30, 11:11 am)
- MM hiring - oldmt (Views: 786, 2017-06-30, 10:57 am)
  - They couldnt put the new transcription probably accounts from Nuance - MT2 (Views: 676, 2017-06-30, 11:16 am)
- MModal has a good MT platform .. but be forewarned - Boston_MT (Views: 1333, 2017-06-30, 11:19 am)
  - This is a good situation for anyone that uses and knows Fluency - MT2 (Views: 614, 2017-06-30, 11:38 am)
    - Are they going to micromanage IC's? - sm (Views: 661, 2017-06-30, 11:43 am)
      - Well they need help to get reports done and they start - MT2 (Views: 922, 2017-06-30, 11:56 am)
  - Fluency - Vin (Views: 575, 2017-06-30, 11:49 am)
    - Agree - worked on both platforms also and prefer Escription - MT