Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Interesting - Just Wondering

Posted: Apr 22nd, 2016 - 7:32 am In Reply to: You are more than welcome. All ICs should review this court - sm

how so many companies get away with this when it is so obvious that at least 90% of us are "employees." Is it because we have been brain washed into thinking that in order to get and keep the job, we cannot question status?? It is a huge "expense" for those of us working as IC to have to pay all of our own taxes each year and supply our own insurance, particularly in this day and age with the Obama thing going on. We should be compensated for that expense somehow, or be classified as the employees that we truly are and given the benefits that come with that, thereby placing the expense back on the shoulders of the company. Is it too late to reverse this status?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

confused on IC vs employee/employer status - confused MT (Views: 604, 2016-04-21, 1:37 pm)
- I believe I can shed light on your questions, and you have asked - sm (Views: 703, 2016-04-21, 3:05 pm)
  - THANK YOU! so much - confused MT (Views: 591, 2016-04-21, 3:23 pm)
    - You are more than welcome. All ICs should review this court - sm (Views: 541, 2016-04-21, 3:45 pm)
      - Interesting - Just Wondering
      - Based on the criteria utilized... - Linda (Views: 503, 2016-04-22, 10:49 am)
        I think you nailed it that most of us ICs are misclassified... - anon (Views: 435, 2016-04-22, 12:22 pm)
- I found this link - although this is Texas law - it applies - to all. see linke (Views: 503, 2016-04-21, 8:52 pm)
- which state laws apply - IC's or Company? - confused MT (Views: 506, 2016-04-22, 7:23 am)
  - I believe a determination by the IRS has to be made - Anon (Views: 472, 2016-04-22, 10:23 am)