Correction to above...SM - Old Anon

Posted: May 12th, 2017 - 6:47 pm In Reply to: Here's how the math is done...SM - Old Anon

meant to say equal to min. wage (no more than), just equal to. Sorry.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Calculating pay - ann (Views: 790, 2017-05-12, 4:07 pm)
- Calculating pay - nn (Views: 580, 2017-05-12, 4:13 pm)
- Here's how the math is done...SM - Old Anon (Views: 718, 2017-05-12, 6:44 pm)
  - Correction to above...SM - Old Anon
  - Does that hold true for ICs? - Nm (Views: 430, 2017-05-12, 7:35 pm)
    - IC pay does not need to...SM - Old Anon (Views: 461, 2017-05-13, 5:13 am)
- Simple answer - MT (Views: 548, 2017-05-12, 7:37 pm)
- Calculating pay - ann (Views: 436, 2017-05-13, 9:14 am)
- The real question is WHO pays 0.05 for editing?! ;) - curiousMT (Views: 477, 2017-05-13, 4:42 pm)