Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Top Viewed:

There is absolutely no possible way the that any MTSO would - ALA

Posted: Oct 5th, 2015 - 2:07 pm In Reply to: 40 hours - nm

agree to pay an IC for 40 hours of training! And any IC worth a grain of salt would absolutely not require 40 hours of training! If you need that much training time, you have no business being an IC MT.

I worked for NEMT a few years back in QA. My job was to train the new MT and provide assistance with blanks, perform random QA audits, etc. I can tell you when I trained someone, it never took 40 hours and if it looked like it would take longer than 8 hours, I had a conversation with a manager!

So good luck OP, but you're going to lose.

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Going to spread the word since NEMT CHEATED me - sm (Views: 1049, 2015-10-05, 12:07 pm)
- I have never been cheated on training wage. - It was put on the invoice and paid. SM (Views: 836, 2015-10-05, 12:27 pm)
  - It is definitely a good thing to be cautious, especially - sm (Views: 785, 2015-10-05, 1:04 pm)
    - maybe it was - just a flat (Views: 890, 2015-10-05, 1:09 pm)
    - "ALL MTSOs are bad?" Really? - Old Pro (Views: 675, 2015-10-06, 2:38 pm)
- How many hours of training did you have? - just wondering (Views: 836, 2015-10-05, 12:31 pm)
  - 40 hours - nm (Views: 654, 2015-10-05, 1:03 pm)
    - There is absolutely no possible way the that any MTSO would - ALA
      - Ummm who said I needed that much training? I have 20 years - sm (Views: 799, 2015-10-05, 2:57 pm)
        Well, darlin' I've been in this biz a bit longer than you - ALA (Views: 901, 2015-10-05, 3:28 pm)
        I think some of these companies put MTs on - long "training" to save themselves $$. (Views: 754, 2015-10-05, 3:32 pm)
        That's possible, but they wouldn't be paying $15 an hour - ALA (Views: 721, 2015-10-05, 4:39 pm)
        Yep that is what they claim to pay for training, but if you all - sm (Views: 738, 2015-10-05, 4:44 pm)
        You sound like you need help - Sammy (Views: 754, 2015-10-06, 2:42 pm)
    - the math does not work $15 x 40 is not $200 - or even almost $500 NM (Views: 680, 2015-10-05, 3:17 pm)
      - Wow. Not "to" bright are ya? Who said how much they did pay me> - nm (Views: 746, 2015-10-05, 3:43 pm)
        your attorney should be advising you to not comment - pubically (Views: 744, 2015-10-05, 3:58 pm)
        Hmm pubicly? Pubic area? I know who this is and I know also - sm (Views: 708, 2015-10-05, 4:43 pm)
        that's rich! You know who we are? You haven't spoken to - an attorney at all (Views: 710, 2015-10-05, 5:16 pm)
        This poster is right - Nick (Views: 722, 2015-10-06, 2:44 pm)
    - If you needed 40 hours of training - Jada (Views: 1010, 2015-10-06, 2:39 pm)
- training wage -- IC??? - anon (Views: 1033, 2015-10-05, 1:11 pm)
  - Where did OP say he/she was IC? sm - Anon (Views: 751, 2015-10-05, 1:30 pm)
    - all NEMT MTs are ICs -- nm - anon (Views: 664, 2015-10-05, 1:45 pm)
      - Nope. You are wrong. I was an employee - nm (Views: 669, 2015-10-05, 2:49 pm)
    - I had 2 weeks paid training with Precyse. - Anon (Views: 875, 2015-10-05, 2:05 pm)
      - Were you an IC? - nm (Views: 630, 2015-10-05, 2:08 pm)
- Sadly, somewhere along the way, you - were misinformed (Views: 1181, 2015-10-06, 9:49 am)