When asked if her insurance already paid the claim and what she would do with the money, she would not answer. She simply replied that putting the $800 in her pocket was not insurance fraud and that the dog owner should not benefit from something that she's paying into. She also stated that it would be cheaper to pay her the $800 than it would be to have to go through homeowner's insurance.
I'm not saying that the dog owner doesn't have any responsibility in this. Unfortunately, I think the poster is trying to take advantage of the situation. She's now talking about setting up a college fund with the money she's going to get. |
Unfortunately, your scenario is not - the case she presented. sm
