Posted By: kathy on 2007-12-18

I am 47 years old (I see from below that I am an old hag :)) and looking to change careers. I've recently been laid off in data entry and internet research (expected) with a chance for re-hire in 2008, but I'm not counting on it. I'm looking for a flexible, transportable, decent paying job. I have been considering nursing for about a year but have it on a back burner as we are currently living 1/2 the year in Mexico and 1/2 the year in the US. We LOVE living on the road and really don't want to change that, HOWEVER; if it comes to taking care of my family (4 children 13-6), we will do whatever it takes. In order to maintain our lifestyle, recognizing that I appreciate and recognize good grammar, enjoy a challenging job, and require a job that allows me to work at home, I've been looking very seriously into the MT field. If I pursued this option, it would be with a certificate from either Andrews or M-Tec. Reading the various MT boards, however, I am quite concerned about the future of MT, both in pay and job opportunity. And then, at the same time, I am heartened by the enthusiasm expressed by IC's and happy MT's. There doesn't seem to be a clear-cut side on which to stand; the detractors seem to be just as common as the enthusiasts. Further adding to my quandary is the trickle of nurses moving from RN positions to MT. I would enjoy the solitude of being an MT and am highly self-motivated. I believe I would enjoy oncology, L&D or peds as an RN but I'm not certain I would have the temperment to deal with patients stealing attention for frivolous issues from those with serious needs. I also wonder about the gore; not necessarily the blood but the pus. I am also concerned about bringing disease and sickness home to my family. So, my current plan is to train with M-Tec or Andrews for a year, obtain my certificate, work as an IC and keep an eye on the nursing field. If possible, I might be able to continue to MT while in nursing school should it prove possible. I am also considering the fields of Radiation Technician and Surgical Tech. The reason I would prefer nursing to RadTec or Surg Tec is due to the travel available for traveling nurses (although I understand MedSurg would require at least 2 years of experience before I would be able to travel nurse). Any thoughts?

Reply By E-mail || Post QUICK reply        [ See Related Messages ]

• In a quandry; RN vs MT - kathy (Views: 483, 2007-12-18)
  • Rn not MT - ej (Views: 212, 2008-03-11)
  • Go for RN - sm - Leaving MT (Views: 383, 2007-12-25)
    • RN, no question, - Leo (Views: 269, 2008-01-17)
      • RN - mt (Views: 242, 2008-01-21)
        • Nope - mt2rn (Views: 311, 2008-01-21)
          • At my nursing school (sm) - Apple Scruff (Views: 308, 2008-01-21)