Posted By: sam on 2008-09-06
In Reply to: Yeah, let her take us back 40 years so everyone can have - Yo. (NM)

now THERE is an endorsement. The voting jews? Redneck fundamentalist? Geez...BIGOTED much?? Another graduate of the Saul Alinsky Marxist-socialist (DNC) school of thought. This is ugly, ugly, and yet another wonderful reason to NOT vote for the big O and give this kind of bigotry power.

Reply By E-mail || Post QUICK reply        [ See Related Messages ]

• Book banning VP? - JA (Views: 87, 2008-09-06)
  • its more than losing books - Roque (Views: 19, 2008-09-06)
  • I heard this, but.... - Just me (Views: 39, 2008-09-06)
    • She was mayor, constituents had asked her... - sam (Views: 30, 2008-09-06)
      • Residents of Alaska - Roque (Views: 24, 2008-09-06)
        • Makes me wonder if she/they truly - for what it's worth (Views: 21, 2008-09-06)
          • I've clearly made up my mind - Chele (Views: 26, 2008-09-06)
            • Me too, and I can't believe what is ignored - earlymt (Views: 12, 2008-09-06)
            • Repeating untruths does not make it truth. - for what it's worth (Views: 30, 2008-09-06)
              • Sarah Palin was asking because - Chele (Views: 29, 2008-09-06)
                • "voters were concerned about the - for what it's worth (Views: 19, 2008-09-06)
                  • I refer you to what was said - Chele (Views: 22, 2008-09-06)
                    • no she was NOT doing her - Roque (Views: 15, 2008-09-06)
                    • Palin might not have taken it anywhere - for what it's worth (Views: 16, 2008-09-06)
                      • The constituents who brought her their concerns... - sam (Views: 14, 2008-09-06)
                        • These constituents have to take - for what it's worth (Views: 11, 2008-09-06)
                          • Exactly! The people had a right to be heard... - sam (Views: 13, 2008-09-06)
                            • Point is we know nothing of what the - for what it's worth (Views: 14, 2008-09-06)
                              • and I believe she will. When Clinton ran for president... - sam (Views: 24, 2008-09-06)
                                • That's absurd because I have heard - for what it's worth (Views: 17, 2008-09-06)
                                • this chick is more concerned - Roque (Views: 18, 2008-09-06)
                                  • that should be First Amendment - Roque (Views: 12, 2008-09-06)
  • Just keep trying to dig up your useless dirt on her. - So pathetic it is funny :) nm (Views: 22, 2008-09-06)
    • Useless dirt? Would not say useless. - for what it's worth (Views: 17, 2008-09-06)
      • exactly why I CANT vote for Obama. - too much about him to NOT trust. nm (Views: 11, 2008-09-06)
        • It's called freedom of choice as - for what it's worth (Views: 12, 2008-09-06)
          • The Republicans are totally AGAINST - freedom of choice. sm (Views: 13, 2008-09-07)
    • Yeah, at least she is not friends or associates with - radicals like the big O is. nm (Views: 23, 2008-09-06)
      • Yeah, let her take us back 40 years so everyone can have - Yo. (NM) (Views: 37, 2008-09-06)
        • your ignorance is amazing -and O will bankrupt the - country with his high taxes,-been done before.nm (Views: 15, 2008-09-06)
          • Gee, you must be a millionaire if you are worried about Obama and taxes. - Tax the rich; they won't even miss it. (Views: 13, 2008-09-06)
        • Wow....even Germany and canada want O.... - sam
        • yeah, go back 50 yr, and take responsibility - sm (Views: 29, 2008-09-06)
          • THe only problem with that is... - sam (Views: 26, 2008-09-06)
            • Why can't more people see that? - mt (Views: 16, 2008-09-06)
              • They are socialist/Marxist. That has been the... - sam (Views: 17, 2008-09-06)