Posted By: cj on 2008-11-18
In Reply to: IC status - cj

http://www.irs.gov/individuals/article/0,,id=106778,00.html

Reply By E-mail || Post QUICK reply        [ See Related Messages ]    [Vote/Moderate]

• IC status - cj (Views: 282, 2008-11-18)
  • Thanks cj! Great thread for newbies! - christy (Views: 8, 2009-01-07)
  • Right on sister!...nm - blondie_1147 (Views: 68, 2008-11-18)
  • Services - sm (Views: 134, 2008-11-18)
  • It seems to me that many ICs think they - kt (Views: 228, 2008-11-18)
    • if you read what i posted... - cj (Views: 126, 2008-11-18)
      • They can tell the IC that work is only - kt (Views: 111, 2008-11-18)
        • That is not what the OP is stating.. - see inside (Views: 88, 2008-11-18)
  • A company has the right to tell an IC - sm (Views: 177, 2008-11-18)
    • sm... - cj (Views: 114, 2008-11-18)
      • But they are not dictated when the IC has to work. - sm (Views: 102, 2008-11-18)
        • the point is an IC does not have to commit - cj (Views: 117, 2008-11-18)
          • Good for you. - nm (Views: 60, 2008-11-18)
          • I work as an IC and I let the MTSO know WHEN - sm (Views: 128, 2008-11-18)
            • That's exactly what I do now - LinK (Views: 89, 2008-11-18)
        • Wrong.... - here's how it should work (Views: 123, 2008-11-18)
          • I agree, but if I have a subcontractor come - KMS (Views: 101, 2008-11-18)
            • "Suggesting" is entirely different from demanding a set shift. - I agree with the OP. The abuse is out of control. (Views: 42, 2008-11-19)
  • oops, link didn't copy so here it is - cj