Posted By: MQmt on 2008-05-09
In Reply to: (1) It was extremely important to get done. - (2) Probably took lots of work to accomplish. NM

x

Reply By E-mail || Post QUICK reply        [ See Related Messages ]    [Vote/Moderate]

• In SA5 and PS just sent long e-mail about SM - MQmt (Views: 414, 2008-05-08)
  • MT does pay big penalties when they are out of contract - leopold/loeb (Views: 148, 2008-05-09)
    • I wish MT Stars had a board just for management so you could give some constructive help. nm - IMHO (Views: 42, 2008-05-11)
    • If they're that concerned about $$$, how come - they gave that woman $25K for filing (Views: 140, 2008-05-09)
      • old forms - Anonymousus (Views: 61, 2008-05-09)
      • (1) It was extremely important to get done. - (2) Probably took lots of work to accomplish. NM (Views: 57, 2008-05-09)
        • 1) that is her job and, 2) that is her job!! - MQmt
          • No incentives and bonuses for you, then! - It's part of YOUR job! LOL (Views: 37, 2008-05-10)
            • What's the deal with having a job AND then needing bribes to actually do it? - leopold/loeb (Views: 34, 2008-05-10)
            • A $25,000 dollar bonus though, get real. No one should get that kind of money as a bonus. - You must be management (LOL) (Views: 41, 2008-05-10)
      • All institutions charge penalties for work out of turnaround - leopold/loeb (Views: 64, 2008-05-09)
        • But they will lose clients (sm) - monica (Views: 48, 2008-05-09)
          • 25K among 4000-5000 employees is 5$ to 6.25$ - leopold/loeb (Views: 32, 2008-05-10)
    • augh 3am, MedQuist pays big $$$ penalites for not meeting turnaround times. - leopold/loeb (Views: 118, 2008-05-09)
  • Big Brrrother/Big Sister - One of Us (Views: 156, 2008-05-08)
  • email - MQnewB (Views: 162, 2008-05-08)
    • I do agree with you about this PS trying to stay in touch and she does seem to be nice. SM - MQmt (Views: 118, 2008-05-08)
  • I think you should look at it differently. (sm) - Oldie but a Goodie (Views: 144, 2008-05-08)
  • SA5 and threatening email from PS - anonymous (Views: 269, 2008-05-08)
    • no e-mail here yet - MIMT (Views: 98, 2008-05-08)
    • No not specific to me but to her whole group. SM - MQmt (Views: 141, 2008-05-08)
      • i think - moonchild (Views: 63, 2008-05-09)