Posted By: SM on 2007-07-21
In Reply to: Because A. They are likely to be sold by Phillips. sm. - no name

The company still has to run no matter what. Do you really think that they should stop hiring until the company is sold? Who knows when or if this will ever happen? It is up to the hiring group to advise the new MTs of the new work pool setup. If they are hiring quality MTs, the MTs should not have a problem. Granted, nobody wants to work on a couple dozen accounts, but some may welcome the challenge. I am always amazed at how naive some of you appear to be...so naive that you think a company would cease hiring just because they may or may not be sold. Maybe they should stop writing paychecks until after the company is sold...how would you like that? This makes no more sense than your suggestion. Gracious!

Reply By E-mail || Post QUICK reply        [ See Related Messages ]    [Vote/Moderate]

• Old friend called about a new job-with guess who? sm - no name (Views: 407, 2007-07-21)
  • Why wouldn't they be hiring? - NM (Views: 163, 2007-07-21)
    • Because A. They are likely to be sold by Phillips. sm. - no name (Views: 195, 2007-07-21)
      • Ummm... - SM
        • Frankly, yes, I thought when they were in the middle of selling, the spending stopped as much as pos - no name (Views: 124, 2007-07-21)
          • The work has to be done. - SM (Views: 117, 2007-07-21)
            • Wasn't the national pool done because of WORK SHORTAGE??? So why keep hiring?? nm. - no name (Views: 70, 2007-07-21)
              • Some were running out and some were never out. - SM (Views: 96, 2007-07-21)
                • Well IMHO it is a LOUSY solution. nm. - no name (Views: 62, 2007-07-21)
            • wow, nice zinger. But isn't the work getting done already? Isn't that why we are in national p - no name (Views: 87, 2007-07-21)
              • See above message. - NM (Views: 83, 2007-07-21)
    • Hiring - MQer (Views: 201, 2007-07-21)
      • This is my point! - NM (Views: 108, 2007-07-21)
        • Oh, and I thought I did....DUH - MQer (Views: 97, 2007-07-21)
          • The other posts are irrelevant... - PJ (Views: 86, 2007-07-21)
            • Half the stuff I read on this board is out of order - MQer (Views: 98, 2007-07-21)
              • LOL. You are NOT the OP - SM (Views: 101, 2007-07-21)
                • PS Maybe you need to set up a Medquist Board CP - MQer (Views: 92, 2007-07-21)
                • OOOOO so sorry - MQer (Views: 100, 2007-07-21)
                  • Wow! How old are you people? - nm (Views: 77, 2007-07-21)
                    • Either 80 or 8 - NM (Views: 70, 2007-07-21)
      • Well one of them can have my job. (sm) - Soon to be ex-MQ (Views: 135, 2007-07-21)