Posted By: On THIS board? LOL! nm on 2006-02-23
In Reply to: Wow, all she asked was a simple - question and all these negative responses.

x

Post QUICK reply        [ See Related Messages ]    [Vote/Moderate]

• New to DocQscribe - Mary (Views: 515, 2006-02-22)
  • DQS - earlytyper (Views: 202, 2006-02-24)
  • Wow, all she asked was a simple - question and all these negative responses. (Views: 206, 2006-02-22)
    • And what were you expecting, hugs and kisses? - On THIS board? LOL! nm
    • apparently just two negative posters generating them all, though. - and what a pair they are! (nm) (Views: 116, 2006-02-23)
  • Shorthand and Instant Text both work with DQS. nm - C-msg (Views: 145, 2006-02-22)
    • Are you pretty sure about Shorthand? (excited here!) - lots more functionality with that... sm (Views: 145, 2006-02-22)
      • Yes absolutely Shorthand works with DQS. sm - C-msg (Views: 121, 2006-02-23)
        • Thank you, really appreciate it. This is the first time I've heard that - SH will work in DQS. (nm) (Views: 82, 2006-02-23)
  • "MANUAL" -- read it and use it. It will answer all - Helping Hand (Views: 182, 2006-02-22)
    • Your manual tells you what other expanders work with DQS? - where'd you get one of those? (nm) (Views: 135, 2006-02-22)
      • An expander wasn't her only issue! - Dum-dum-dum-dumb (Views: 123, 2006-02-22)
      • No. It tells you that DQS already HAS a word - expander. Should have asked in training about oth (Views: 143, 2006-02-22)
        • Wow, what an extreme - Anon (Views: 128, 2006-02-23)
          • I'm sorry I have to disagree with the old saying.. - sm (Views: 105, 2006-02-23)
          • Just how much forethought does it take to explore - all possibilities? lol (Views: 101, 2006-02-23)
            • More Words of Wisdom from the Mighty MT - Anon (Views: 102, 2006-02-23)
          • No, see, but you don't get it. We were all supposed to be - psychic enough to ask these questions... sm (Views: 95, 2006-02-23)
        • what part of "OTHER expanders" didn't you get? - some people don't like the built-in, OMG. nm (Views: 120, 2006-02-22)
          • Please...let's make courtesy our way of life - Anon (Views: 86, 2006-02-23)
            • I agree, Anon. I will try not to react to the High & Mighty One's (Ones'?) - responses anymore. (sm) (Views: 96, 2006-02-23)
              • Of course I didn't mean you - sm (Views: 89, 2006-02-23)
                • Oh, good. :) (I'm not prettier, or richer, but am smarter, so they can all bite me). - and I mean that in a nice way! lol (nm) (Views: 75, 2006-02-23)
                  • My goodness, how extremely rude thou art... - Anon (Views: 66, 2006-02-24)
                    • I think she was agreeing with you Anon nm - sgh (Views: 69, 2006-02-24)
            • These are the same people who - sm (Views: 93, 2006-02-23)
          • How stupid are you to not ask this stuff during training? lol - lol (Views: 135, 2006-02-22)
            • Right! But we're being mean! Meanies!! - AMAZEDATTHIS (Views: 106, 2006-02-22)
              • NO, you put a new meaning to the word "mean". Is mean your middle name? You are toxic. - min (Views: 103, 2006-02-23)
                • With a taste of your lips I'm on a ride........ - sm (Views: 83, 2006-02-23)
              • lol Seems they don't understand the first requirements for - working at home -- see message (Views: 131, 2006-02-22)
                • #5 is the big deal breaker here!! - AMAZEDATTHIS (Views: 76, 2006-02-23)
  • Tools, Options, General, Automatic Rewind. - sm (Views: 138, 2006-02-22)
    • Tech support put PRD on my MQ computer last night as if it is going to work. Sure hope - so. What do you know about PRD working? (Views: 110, 2006-02-22)
      • PRD for DQS? or for MTShell or something else? - doesn't make sense with DQS, IMO. (sm) (Views: 124, 2006-02-22)
        • They transferred my PRD file into the... - expander. (Views: 123, 2006-02-22)
          • Ah, yes, they transferred your expansions FROM PRD - into DQS. (sm) (Views: 105, 2006-02-22)
        • Beats me, LOL. I'm still trying to figure out what DEP, DQS, DocQManage, DocQScribe, and DEP - are. I know it is the "new" platform that (Views: 113, 2006-02-22)
          • This will describe all those terms for you - Go look here (Views: 119, 2006-02-22)
          • Hang in there. It really is confusing. - (sm) (Views: 107, 2006-02-22)
            • Easier when thought of this way..... - sm (Views: 98, 2006-02-23)
              • sounds good to me. :) (nm) - other helper (Views: 58, 2006-02-23)
  • I wonder why in the world MQ can't give us this info to begin - with. Anybody knows you only produce with expande (Views: 159, 2006-02-22)
    • MQ has its own expanders and spell check built - AMAZEDATTHIS (Views: 208, 2006-02-22)
      • U R Fulla Bull! - MQQA2 (Views: 115, 2006-02-27)
      • Are you MQ-ExDR2 under a new name? - lol You post like them! lol (Views: 105, 2006-02-22)
      • You sure are amazed at a lot... - AMAZED AT YOU (Views: 115, 2006-02-22)
      • I thought you were mainly just mean, but you're not - that swift either. Instant Text DOES work in DQS. (Views: 115, 2006-02-22)
        • Oh, swift one. I never said Instant Text or any other - AMAZEDATTHIS (Views: 118, 2006-02-22)
          • Is it hard to be this petty? - You win the prize. (Views: 63, 2006-02-27)
          • so nasty, when one just asked about DQS..sm - Happy MQer here....this thread seems (Views: 98, 2006-02-23)
            • Do YOU read much? The original poster - AMAZEDATTHIS (Views: 83, 2006-02-23)
              • and you are STILL nasty and sarcastic, eh?...sm - Happy MQer here....this thread seems (Views: 88, 2006-02-23)
                • wow - techie (Views: 111, 2006-02-23)
          • oh go crawl back in your hole, you came out of hibernation too soon. - jd (Views: 87, 2006-02-23)
      • YOU WIN...you are the most mean spirited, nasty, wrong on many counts, piece of work I've - min (Views: 137, 2006-02-22)
        • so nasty, when one just asked about DQS..sm - Happy MQer here....this thread seems (Views: 100, 2006-02-23)
      • Well it would have been a nice touch to have shared this info - with the MTs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Views: 105, 2006-02-22)
        • Yes, & it should have been common knowledge to tech support when - we would ask them. Why didn't they? Don't (Views: 114, 2006-02-22)