Yes, I found it interesting that they phrased it - the way they did

Posted: Jul 20th, 2018 - 4:01 pm In Reply to: Jobs lost - SpentMT

Question re the 150 left - were those included in the noon call, i.e., are they going to be laid off in a few months?

Or, is the 500 the total of all laid off, both now and in a few months, and the 150 are the actual remaining employees?

Interestingly, by decade of age group, 51-60 (I am in that age group) had greatest number laid off (208) and also the greatest number of those not selected (71).

One 89-year-old was laid off - good on that person!

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

How many jobs were lost this time - ss (Views: 1061, 2018-07-20, 9:33 am)
- Jobs lost - Azrial (Views: 1034, 2018-07-20, 9:53 am)
  - She is probably asking because she is not a Nuance employee - or was not laid off. She does not (Views: 853, 2018-07-20, 10:31 am)
- Jobs lost - SpentMT (Views: 1027, 2018-07-20, 11:23 am)
  - Wow. Thanks for the statistic. Is that the magic number - 500 each time they lay off a group? (Views: 799, 2018-07-20, 12:32 pm)
  - Jobs Lost - Smoke (Views: 918, 2018-07-20, 1:04 pm)
    - It is in small print at the very end of the packet - By law they have to include when RIF (Views: 771, 2018-07-20, 1:32 pm)
    - Jobs Lost - Mtgone (Views: 826, 2018-07-20, 1:39 pm)
      - That explains it. - Smoke (Views: 728, 2018-07-20, 1:48 pm)
        Over 40 here. Nothing regarding how many were laid off. - gma (Views: 717, 2018-07-20, 2:22 pm)
  - Yes, I found it interesting that they phrased it - the way they did
    - How Many - former POC (Views: 579, 2018-07-23, 8:08 am)