Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

That's what I read too about 1:30 call - Confused. - .

Posted: Jul 18th, 2018 - 9:10 am In Reply to: That is odd. I was on the noon call. I thought - someone posted here that

nm

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Was there a third call today that anyone ACTUALLY was on and knows existed? - MT (Views: 831, 2018-07-17, 8:35 pm)
- Nuance - 3rd call yesterday - LaidOffMT (Views: 880, 2018-07-18, 8:47 am)
  - Quite the warm statement. Thanks for quoting it for - us. Geez. I hate this company. (Views: 625, 2018-07-18, 8:52 am)
    - Your OM - sm (Views: 699, 2018-07-18, 9:31 am)
  - Where's the logic - . (Views: 653, 2018-07-18, 8:56 am)
    - That is odd. I was on the noon call. I thought - someone posted here that (Views: 672, 2018-07-18, 9:02 am)
      - That's what I read too about 1:30 call - Confused. - .
  - 3rd Call Yesterday - Jaggar (Views: 591, 2018-07-18, 10:47 am)
  - Why did the webex invite say it would take 30 - mins I wonder? (Views: 463, 2018-07-18, 10:58 am)
    - Because scheduling the call with the software uses - 30 min, etc blocks of time. (Views: 562, 2018-07-18, 11:00 am)
      - Oh, thank you. With the past layoffs they just had us - dial in on the phone. nm (Views: 509, 2018-07-18, 11:41 am)
  - That has to be one of the coldest - W/C Reviewer (Views: 636, 2018-07-18, 2:17 pm)
  - To laidOffMT - Deb (Views: 539, 2018-07-19, 12:08 am)
    - Laid off .... - Nhmt12 (Views: 479, 2018-07-20, 3:35 pm)