I work on both. There are things about each that - I like/dislike. Not difficult

Posted: Apr 19th, 2018 - 6:38 am In Reply to: Is Edmat or Escription a good system to learn. I have always worked on - PAMT

to learn. Personally, I like eScription better, but that's just me. It probably depends on the accounts and what they require in the way of "extras" like how to insert cc's and special notations, pend notes, etc. They can make it simple or more complicated!

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Is Edmat or Escription a good system to learn. I have always worked on - PAMT (Views: 1015, 2018-04-19, 6:25 am)
- I work on both. There are things about each that - I like/dislike. Not difficult
- Emdat horrible, Escription better but Fluency is best sm - ohmemy (Views: 685, 2018-04-19, 10:03 am)
  - Agree, EMDAT is cumbersome to use. The only - thing I like about it is (Views: 614, 2018-04-19, 2:17 pm)
  - Keizer - Happy MLS (Views: 526, 2018-04-25, 6:04 am)
    - So how's the QA? - just checkin (Views: 249, 2018-05-17, 6:45 pm)
- Are we talking about the Emdat version - that has the text boxes (Views: 517, 2018-04-20, 7:19 pm)
  - Right, structured InScribe vs. unstructured, yuck. - and paying less for "qualified text"-nm (Views: 604, 2018-04-20, 8:15 pm)
    - What?? - smr (Views: 195, 2018-05-17, 6:46 pm)