Except it affects the bottom line/penalty fees - at the MTSO

Posted: Feb 4th, 2018 - 3:23 pm In Reply to: Someone has a foolproof plan to earn a paycheck. - LOL.

So not foolproof (MTSOs contract for a certain percentage of errors and if over, they get penalized).

But that's not to say I am agreeing with these nitpicky MTSOs. If they want perfect work, they need to pay accordingly.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

QA strikes again - Old MT (Views: 1344, 2018-02-03, 1:35 pm)
- QA - Whizkid (Views: 790, 2018-02-03, 7:55 pm)
  - Someone has a foolproof plan to earn a paycheck. - LOL. (Views: 801, 2018-02-03, 8:16 pm)
    - Except it affects the bottom line/penalty fees - at the MTSO
      - At this juncture, I doubt MTs are overly - concerned about the (Views: 745, 2018-02-04, 10:20 pm)
  - QA - I bet (Views: 757, 2018-02-04, 12:02 am)
- formatting - oldmt (Views: 576, 2018-02-06, 7:16 am)
- I'm sure QA is tired of being ripped apart for doing their jobs, too. - nm (Views: 681, 2018-02-06, 7:48 am)
  - Spot on! - see msg (Views: 603, 2018-02-06, 8:26 am)
    - Yup - Former QA (Views: 581, 2018-02-06, 12:33 pm)
      - Catching a REAL mistake is fine with me - Old MT (Views: 561, 2018-02-06, 1:26 pm)
        The non-critical errors grading simply needs - to disappear altogether. (Views: 533, 2018-02-06, 1:47 pm)
  - QA - QA (Views: 506, 2018-02-07, 1:59 am)
    - I So Agree - Former QA (Views: 607, 2018-02-07, 10:49 am)
- QA - Okie2004 (Views: 611, 2018-02-06, 5:21 pm)
- Nit picking on steroids - mnb (Views: 735, 2018-02-06, 8:12 pm)
  - Care to explain in detail? - (nm) (Views: 519, 2018-02-06, 8:20 pm)