Not only is it unnecessary but - sm Posted: Dec 8th, 2017 - 7:53 am In Reply to: Abbreviations and VR - LongtimeMT
How much time have you spent removing characters that could add to your line count? You cannot get marked off on an audit for something that is technically correct. If VR had put in the slang, that is one thing, but to change something that is perfectly correct back to slang, is just undermining your own production. If VR does do the slang dictated, I still expand it, because it is just more professional that way.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)
- Abbreviations and VR - LongtimeMT (Views: 1369, 2017-12-07, 10:43 am)
- I never change them back to slang - LDSMT (Views: 1003, 2017-12-07, 3:45 pm)
- I'm with you, if SR puts it and it's ok...sm - Old Anon (Views: 884, 2017-12-07, 4:07 pm)
- I'm with both of you! - LongtimeMT (Views: 778, 2017-12-07, 6:19 pm)
- Dates - MTfor years (Views: 1066, 2017-12-07, 7:38 pm)
- Agree - LongtimeMT (Views: 832, 2017-12-07, 8:13 pm)
- I concur. - MTfor years (Views: 758, 2017-12-07, 8:36 pm)
- Not only is it unnecessary but - sm
|