Today's Top Viewed:

Thank you - for your reply

Posted: Nov 21st, 2017 - 11:01 am In Reply to: credentialed - see msg

Pretty much a lost cause of a lot of people because probably by week 9 they will hit with some inconsequential "critical error" and you are screwed.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

New no blanks rule. Apparently is true, BUT I - talked to my OM and the goal (Views: 2425, 2017-11-20, 6:57 pm)
- not for us - sm (Views: 1557, 2017-11-20, 7:16 pm)
  - conflicting, again - mtsayswhat (Views: 1340, 2017-11-20, 8:44 pm)
    - Nuance - MT (Views: 985, 2017-11-21, 3:12 am)
  - No blanks - anon (Views: 951, 2017-11-21, 4:26 am)
    - me either but - SM (Views: 934, 2017-11-21, 7:20 am)
      - to me either but... - sm (Views: 832, 2017-11-22, 7:31 am)
- What do - they mean by (Views: 948, 2017-11-21, 8:28 am)
  - credentialed - see msg (Views: 1002, 2017-11-21, 8:51 am)
    - Thank you - for your reply
- Just like patient care grid scam, no blanks is - scam to get rid of QC people. (Views: 891, 2017-11-21, 9:02 am)
- one would think that we would get - sm (Views: 968, 2017-11-21, 2:55 pm)
- Blanks - FrozenToes (Views: 727, 2017-11-24, 4:46 pm)