conflicting, again - mtsayswhat Posted: Nov 20th, 2017 - 8:44 pm In Reply to: not for us - sm
Once again, it seems as things are not "across the board." How can something so big as this "no blanks" rule be interpreted so differently depending on your account or your OM? All I can do is shake my head and continue looking for another job.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)
- New no blanks rule. Apparently is true, BUT I - talked to my OM and the goal (Views: 2425, 2017-11-20, 6:57 pm)
- not for us - sm (Views: 1556, 2017-11-20, 7:16 pm)
- conflicting, again - mtsayswhat
- Nuance - MT (Views: 984, 2017-11-21, 3:12 am)
- No blanks - anon (Views: 950, 2017-11-21, 4:26 am)
- What do - they mean by (Views: 945, 2017-11-21, 8:28 am)
- credentialed - see msg (Views: 999, 2017-11-21, 8:51 am)
- Thank you - for your reply (Views: 917, 2017-11-21, 11:01 am)
- Blanks - FrozenToes (Views: 725, 2017-11-24, 4:46 pm)
|