not for us - sm

Posted: Nov 20th, 2017 - 7:16 pm In Reply to: New no blanks rule. Apparently is true, BUT I - talked to my OM and the goal

even credentialed on my accounts must now follow "no blanks" rule, i.e., must send any blanks to QC no matter what.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

New no blanks rule. Apparently is true, BUT I - talked to my OM and the goal (Views: 2426, 2017-11-20, 6:57 pm)
- not for us - sm
  - conflicting, again - mtsayswhat (Views: 1340, 2017-11-20, 8:44 pm)
    - Nuance - MT (Views: 988, 2017-11-21, 3:12 am)
  - No blanks - anon (Views: 951, 2017-11-21, 4:26 am)
    - me either but - SM (Views: 935, 2017-11-21, 7:20 am)
      - to me either but... - sm (Views: 832, 2017-11-22, 7:31 am)
- What do - they mean by (Views: 948, 2017-11-21, 8:28 am)
  - credentialed - see msg (Views: 1003, 2017-11-21, 8:51 am)
    - Thank you - for your reply (Views: 921, 2017-11-21, 11:01 am)
- Just like patient care grid scam, no blanks is - scam to get rid of QC people. (Views: 891, 2017-11-21, 9:02 am)
- one would think that we would get - sm (Views: 968, 2017-11-21, 2:55 pm)
- Blanks - FrozenToes (Views: 728, 2017-11-24, 4:46 pm)