Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Top Viewed:

but ... - ann

Posted: Nov 2nd, 2017 - 12:38 am In Reply to: If this is to be company wide protocol, then they - need to revise grid and not count

They have to pay min. wage, but if they have to for so long you get put on probation or let go -- I think they're trying to get rid of as many us as they can or want a bunch of us to quit 'cause we're making even less money if our QA gets dinged for blanks. They don't HAVE to do anything that they don't want to. They are NUANCE.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

No blanks company wide? - MTmom (Views: 1447, 2017-11-01, 2:48 pm)
- guessing! - anon (Views: 976, 2017-11-01, 2:55 pm)
- Yes, got the - email too! (Views: 1068, 2017-11-01, 3:02 pm)
- I find this very hard to believe. - sm (Views: 997, 2017-11-01, 3:11 pm)
- It is almost Christmas and when they usually roll - out exciting changes. Merry X-Mas! (Views: 886, 2017-11-01, 3:16 pm)
- This just encourages guessing and junk sent - which contradicts their quality committment (Views: 735, 2017-11-01, 3:20 pm)
- no blanks - -- (Views: 974, 2017-11-01, 3:22 pm)
- Blank the heck out of them and send them - through. Let them explain to customers (Views: 787, 2017-11-01, 3:24 pm)
- Blanks - SpentMT (Views: 855, 2017-11-01, 3:26 pm)
- Even though I dont work here, I read this and it makes me - absolutely furious for all of you. nm (Views: 857, 2017-11-01, 3:30 pm)
- The salespeople for this company, who probably know zilch - about transcription, promise (Views: 697, 2017-11-01, 3:47 pm)
- If I get such an email I will - POLITELY (because I am not willing to stoop to the (Views: 991, 2017-11-01, 3:53 pm)
  - If you forward or publish that email, many others of us - could help respond also, with fake address. SM (Views: 940, 2017-11-01, 4:01 pm)
  - I suggest politely taking the position that any - new policy that lowers income (Views: 857, 2017-11-02, 12:09 pm)
- sounds like your OM is trying to get rid of you - just a guess nm (Views: 840, 2017-11-01, 4:10 pm)
  - No blanks, - Bobo (Views: 580, 2017-11-05, 12:43 am)
- Company wide for maybe your account - sm (Views: 767, 2017-11-01, 4:13 pm)
  - Guessing it is! - anon (Views: 792, 2017-11-01, 4:21 pm)
    - Just posting snippets is not helping us. - NM (Views: 785, 2017-11-01, 4:31 pm)
- So when does this go into effect? - mt446 (Views: 1014, 2017-11-01, 4:41 pm)
  - Cherry picking new queen - anon (Views: 1397, 2017-11-01, 4:52 pm)
    - Hmmm - .... (Views: 730, 2017-11-01, 4:57 pm)
    - So your OM said right now, no more blanks - what are your (Views: 733, 2017-11-01, 5:18 pm)
      - No blanks company wide? - MTmom (Views: 641, 2017-11-02, 8:57 am)
        right there is false info - sm (Views: 636, 2017-11-02, 9:30 am)
        ? - MTmom (Views: 907, 2017-11-02, 9:55 am)
        My point is that if your OM or whatever - said to send stuff to QA (Views: 657, 2017-11-02, 10:23 am)
        blanks - irritated MT (Views: 619, 2017-11-02, 4:16 pm)
- What platform are you on that you received this - info. The majority of my accts have always (Views: 748, 2017-11-01, 5:35 pm)
- If they are talking about just not pending - blanks to the client and (Views: 677, 2017-11-01, 5:45 pm)
- Another forceful firing.. - MTfor years (Views: 917, 2017-11-01, 6:32 pm)
  - Do as I did when I worked there for the blank problem. - DoneDealNow (Views: 977, 2017-11-01, 6:49 pm)
    - client is not supposed to get blanks - without a pending reason (Views: 689, 2017-11-01, 7:04 pm)
    - The clients need to learn. - MTfor years (Views: 1028, 2017-11-01, 7:50 pm)
- No blanks - irritated MT (Views: 696, 2017-11-01, 9:07 pm)
- If this is to be company wide protocol, then they - need to revise grid and not count (Views: 715, 2017-11-01, 10:19 pm)
  - but ... - ann
- No blanks policy - they are trying to get you to quit - nm (Views: 670, 2017-11-02, 1:23 am)
- no blanks - anonymousmt (Views: 996, 2017-11-02, 8:14 am)
  - They don't have to start charging us - they already do (Views: 686, 2017-11-02, 8:19 am)
- Absolutely NOT! This is a policy I would NOT comply with - in any circumstances (Views: 698, 2017-11-04, 8:28 am)