You don't know what you're talking about. Look it up. - sm

Posted: Oct 31st, 2017 - 8:06 am In Reply to: No you are wrong. As long as they are making the MT an employee - it IS a labor violation

It is not a labor violation. The companies are not "getting away" with anything. Stop trying to stir things up. Maybe you should spend your time finding out the truth instead of spewing lies on this board.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

I agree - mom2huskies (Views: 908, 2017-10-30, 8:35 am)
- I have always thought this!! It is A FRAUD! - amyo (Views: 676, 2017-10-30, 10:29 am)
  - Exactly. You get paid hourly - even on a slow day (Views: 933, 2017-10-30, 1:25 pm)
    - We're paid by production and not hourly and that's the difference. - sm (Views: 645, 2017-10-31, 8:37 am)
  - And there's the rub. Because we are at-home employees - sm (Views: 634, 2017-10-30, 2:15 pm)
    - Rub - MT (Views: 1132, 2017-10-30, 2:25 pm)
      - Because we're production employees and not paid hourly. - nm (Views: 532, 2017-10-31, 8:38 am)
    - No you are wrong. As long as they are making the MT an employee - it IS a labor violation (Views: 521, 2017-10-30, 6:20 pm)
      - You don't know what you're talking about. Look it up. - sm
  - No it's not. Such drama. - nm (Views: 468, 2017-10-31, 8:39 am)
    - SO you are okay with having to work a schedule and them not providing work during that schedule? - Unreal (Views: 540, 2017-11-04, 7:34 am)
- What is the purpose of the 6 minute thing - Never understood it (Views: 548, 2017-10-31, 11:38 am)
  - out of work - Juice (Views: 493, 2017-11-03, 12:47 pm)