New transcriptionist - Stormy

Posted: Sep 10th, 2017 - 10:30 am In Reply to: To Ilene - Before you post here, you should

Thank you Ilene! I am a 30-year-career MT but stopped in 2013 after our office went to Electronic Medical Records (not because I wanted to). I was just happy they kept me on and used me in other areas of the clinic. My friend (who has been a Registered Radiologist Tech called me for advice about doing it); hence, my posts here on MT Stars. I told her it had been awhile since I had transcribed, but that I would get her all the information I could. I love MT Stars and knew you guys would be truthful!

Thanks again for your honest response!

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

New transcriptionist - Ilene Graebner (Views: 1149, 2017-09-07, 3:10 pm)
- To Ilene - Before you post here, you should (Views: 891, 2017-09-07, 4:59 pm)
  - New transcriptionist - Stormy
- Nuance is probably hiring - Jellybean (Views: 808, 2017-09-07, 5:44 pm)
  - Newbie - Ilene Graebner (Views: 764, 2017-09-07, 5:54 pm)
    - No Californians - Jellybean (Views: 709, 2017-09-07, 6:12 pm)
      - It sure does! I was one of the CA MTs laid off - 1 month shy of a year ago (Views: 833, 2017-09-07, 6:59 pm)
        What bothers me - Jellybean (Views: 813, 2017-09-07, 7:18 pm)
        In-house jobs which are far and few between do - actually pay at that range. (Views: 648, 2017-09-07, 8:09 pm)
        But in the meantime, we are paid poverty - wages and held to (Views: 573, 2017-09-07, 10:19 pm)
        IMO, labor friendly laws were the deciding factors. - Nuancer. sm (Views: 624, 2017-09-08, 1:21 pm)
      - No Californians? - Ilene Graebner (Views: 675, 2017-09-07, 11:16 pm)
        Many MTSOs - xx (Views: 795, 2017-09-08, 7:04 am)
        New transcriptionist - Stormy (Views: 596, 2017-09-10, 10:44 am)
        Um, okay. - xx (Views: 686, 2017-09-10, 2:34 pm)
        Because - see message (Views: 559, 2017-09-09, 4:58 pm)