Agree - Instant Text - NT

Posted: Jul 29th, 2017 - 1:15 pm In Reply to: Instant Text - no question - anon

and it works with all transcription platforms, including non-Word ones.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

What is the best expander program in your opinion.. - Tired hands (Views: 551, 2017-07-29, 10:26 am)
- Instant Text - no question - anon (Views: 418, 2017-07-29, 11:47 am)
  - Agree - Instant Text - NT
    - I like Shorthand....it works with all platforms and is - a little simpler to use but still (Views: 500, 2017-07-29, 2:31 pm)
      - Shorthand - agree (Views: 503, 2017-07-30, 6:22 am)
        Instant Text is vastly superior to ShortHand - IT user (Views: 408, 2017-07-30, 4:25 pm)
        Boy - Are You Assumptive (Views: 364, 2017-07-31, 6:58 am)
        Both are excellent with significant tradeoffs. - I chose SH way over 15 years ago (Views: 457, 2017-07-31, 8:56 am)
        Try Instant Text again - IT user (Views: 357, 2017-07-31, 10:06 am)
        Thanks, but I just glanced at my main dictionary, - just short of 80K entries. :) (Views: 394, 2017-07-31, 11:11 am)
        Expander comparison - MMK (Views: 437, 2017-07-31, 1:36 pm)
        That is fun to see, thank you. You are right that - careful review 15 years ago, (Views: 392, 2017-07-31, 3:47 pm)
        About Autocorrect vs. Shorthand functions... - still chugging along (Views: 430, 2017-08-01, 7:25 am)
        I do lots of short forms that delete the original word - and replace with new. In SH. (Views: 568, 2017-08-02, 1:10 pm)
        Thanks for the info. :) - (nm) still chugging along (Views: 413, 2017-08-04, 1:00 am)