Upcoming Quality Score Changes - laughable

Posted: May 16th, 2017 - 10:11 am

Am I missing something, or is there anything that benefits us? How is age critical? If anything, I see more opportunity for them to pounce and steal money, am I wrong?

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Upcoming Quality Score Changes - laughable (Views: 961, 2017-05-16, 10:11 am)
- Yep, I interpreted same. For them to claim a - tougher than normal stance for industry (Views: 899, 2017-05-16, 10:45 am)
- Confused - ss (Views: 899, 2017-05-16, 1:24 pm)
  - I suspect the objective was to confuse everyone. There - is no benefit here. It is still a (Views: 585, 2017-05-16, 2:46 pm)
    - Stop with the negative Nellie stuff. Not everyone feels - the same way. Maybe you are just (Views: 774, 2017-05-16, 7:37 pm)
      - Negative Nelly - laughable (Views: 676, 2017-05-17, 7:53 am)
        I think she's a manager. They have a new pat answer. - See message. (Views: 397, 2017-05-18, 1:35 pm)
      - Are you an IMEDX OM? - Tired old MT (Views: 315, 2017-05-24, 12:51 pm)
- Shade - Nuance (Views: 538, 2017-05-17, 8:45 am)
- What quality score changes are yall talking about? - aviatrix (Views: 479, 2017-05-17, 4:46 pm)
  - new error categories and different points. Email the other - day. (Views: 522, 2017-05-17, 5:25 pm)