Punished for quality - Unreal

Posted: Aug 20th, 2016 - 8:02 am

Has anyone else read the FAQ for the new BS pay plan?

The question of why the QA grid was restructured is answered with the statement that the earning potential was disproportionately greater than expected.

So, some of us made to much money (haaaa ha ha ha) doing our jobs too well.

You have got to be kidding me. This is the most hateful sh*t show I've ever seen.

No wonder they warned us that we couldn't post anything but glowing reviews on social media outlets. Who on the face of this planet would say anything nice about this sweatshop nastiness?

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Punished for quality - Unreal (Views: 1544, 2016-08-20, 8:02 am)
- Pay grid - MT (Views: 1046, 2016-08-20, 8:09 am)
  - Read it yourself in Enrich - Unreal (Views: 1109, 2016-08-20, 8:44 am)
    - The meeting that sold the new pay plan - Jan Brady (Views: 1138, 2016-08-20, 9:12 am)
    - Yep, I saw that. Exactly what you said.... - I hate to re-read it slowly (Views: 819, 2016-08-20, 6:50 pm)
- I saw this too and read it several times thinking did - they really put this in print. (Views: 1243, 2016-08-20, 10:34 am)
- It begs the question----sm - anon (Views: 887, 2016-08-20, 9:16 pm)
  - Honesty - anon (Views: 745, 2016-08-21, 6:36 am)
  - I've tried multiple times to print out that new grid..sm - mt2 (Views: 682, 2016-08-23, 2:46 pm)
    - Try dl'ing them directly from the Enrich module - sm (Views: 615, 2016-08-23, 4:48 pm)
- It is almost scary that they actually put this out in - writing. Shows they do not care (Views: 748, 2016-08-21, 1:02 pm)
  - Everyone needs to print out new grid and the FAQ - statement and head to unemployment (Views: 790, 2016-08-21, 4:29 pm)
- TSM needs to re-read said information. - Density is rampant. (Views: 770, 2016-08-22, 11:49 am)
  - Yep. My TSM same thing, does not see where the - decrease is. I chalk it up though (Views: 727, 2016-08-22, 5:46 pm)
- What!?!?! - Anon (Views: 1019, 2016-08-24, 9:44 am)