QA payperoid - MT55

Well, now I'm bummed --  had 3 reports QA'd last week that were 100%, today they QA'd another one and now I am just below the 99% requirement.  It was a very short (about 25) line report.  Must be a better way of figuring QA percentage, my thinking may be crazy here but I don't see why, for example, if an error is the same error on 2 different reports (one long and one short), it should count so much more on the short report -- same error. Sorry, I'm probably not explaining my thoughts correctly -- just think a different method of "grading" the reports would make more sense and be a little more fair but then, what do I know!

Reply By Email Options

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

• QA payperoid - MT55 (Views: 753, 2015-09-26, 1:28 pm)
  • I completely understand what you mean. When - wannie (Views: 559, 2015-09-26, 1:56 pm)
    • You're right - Something is wrong (Views: 479, 2015-09-26, 2:26 pm)
      • Yep...When a 0.25 error puts you below 99% - They are using funny math. (Views: 726, 2015-09-26, 4:38 pm)
        • They do not use the minus from 100 here. My TSM - who has since left told me a (Views: 596, 2015-09-26, 5:40 pm)
  • One of the MANY reasons.... - we should be paid.... (Views: 501, 2015-09-26, 4:36 pm)
  • Yep, same thing. - Please sm. (Views: 420, 2015-09-27, 1:02 am)
  • Same here but they don't care - anon (Views: 357, 2015-09-27, 9:11 pm)

• Latest Posts
• Unanswered
• Top Viewed
• Most Discussed
• Most Liked