If she lives in an at-will employment - state

Reply By Email Options

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

• I was fired and now my former employer is fighting my unemployment! - SM (Views: 1061, 2012-04-30, 1:41 pm)
  • Similar happened to me years ago - MT2 (Views: 372, 2012-04-30, 1:50 pm)
    • Even worse - anon (Views: 351, 2012-04-30, 1:54 pm)
      • Typical American business plan: "Use 'em up and - then throw "em away..." (NM) (Views: 226, 2012-04-30, 2:02 pm)
    • Umm - isn't "caring for your child while working" the - whole selling point of at-home work? (Views: 291, 2012-04-30, 2:00 pm)
      • No, working from home is not the selling point - to care for your child...see msg (Views: 325, 2012-04-30, 2:16 pm)
        • But, at-home or on-site, your breaks are still required - by law. And even on-site, we - S/M (Views: 288, 2012-04-30, 2:21 pm)
          • I wasn't referring to breaks I was referring to the - see msg (Views: 270, 2012-04-30, 2:32 pm)
            • Your defense is going to be standard practice. EVERYONE, E-MAIL OP YOUR STATEMENT - about standard practice in this industry. SM (Views: 234, 2012-04-30, 7:25 pm)
              • If she lives in an at-will employment - state
                • There was a thunderstorm going on at the time. I guess I could have said she's a big girl and - OP (Views: 199, 2012-05-01, 9:21 am)
                  • Length of walk irrelevant. At-will law does not exempt employers - from complying with other labor laws. But the big (Views: 163, 2012-05-01, 9:34 am)
          • Not necessarily - BTDT (Views: 202, 2012-04-30, 7:21 pm)
            • I understand what you're saying. However, we are told - OP (Views: 166, 2012-05-01, 9:04 am)
              • BTDT makes good points - Ayn (Views: 140, 2012-05-01, 10:15 am)
  • Re being fired and UE - sm (Views: 306, 2012-04-30, 2:01 pm)
    • There weren't any specific times we were required to take our breaks. - SM (Views: 245, 2012-04-30, 2:12 pm)
      • you need a lawyer - slave wages (Views: 146, 2012-05-01, 2:22 pm)
  • Hmmm... - empire lady (Views: 263, 2012-04-30, 3:16 pm)
  • Well... - AnonToo (Views: 254, 2012-04-30, 4:29 pm)
  • Were you paid hourly or on production? - see message (Views: 212, 2012-04-30, 5:41 pm)
    • It was hourly. - OP (Views: 175, 2012-05-01, 8:57 am)
  • THAT was your mistake. telling them where you really were. - me (Views: 223, 2012-04-30, 5:55 pm)
    • She worked for a hospital and usually they pay - pretty good hourly rates. (Views: 211, 2012-04-30, 6:00 pm)
  • After reading all these posts, - I am counting my blessings! (Views: 222, 2012-04-30, 6:07 pm)
  • My take - Ayn (Views: 186, 2012-05-01, 7:08 am)
    • I suspect falsifying documents refers to the timecard - OP was paid hourly (Views: 182, 2012-05-01, 9:11 am)
      • That's what I figured they meant, but how can they back that up when - OP (Views: 155, 2012-05-01, 9:28 am)
    • How can I be held accountable for rules that were never verbalized or written down for that matter? - OP (Views: 182, 2012-05-01, 9:12 am)
      • While you say this is unfair, - sm (Views: 187, 2012-05-01, 9:20 am)
        • Oh, and P.S. - sm (Views: 144, 2012-05-01, 9:22 am)
        • Infraction instead of infarction. - MT coming out in me. nm (Views: 153, 2012-05-01, 9:34 am)
      • I can see your point - Ayn (Views: 178, 2012-05-01, 9:38 am)
  • well I'll just say this - anon (Views: 153, 2012-05-01, 4:48 pm)
  • May I ask what you went to school for? - Ms. Penguin (Views: 137, 2012-05-01, 9:32 pm)
    • I'm finishing out my RHIT degree and medical coding. - OP (Views: 192, 2012-05-02, 8:51 am)

• Latest Posts
• Unanswered
• Top Viewed
• Most Discussed