Same message... - Birdylove Posted: Nov 6th, 2009 - 10:03 pm In Reply to: Termination for using expanders? - sasha1
I was just coming on to post about this and see if anyone else had received this message today. Of course, I had to spend 10 minutes ranting about it first, while my poor daughter listened and nodded sympathetically. 
I think this is absolutely ridiculous! Am I now supposed to spend my own time redoing all of my expanders?!?
Wasn't there a "helpful" MQ tip at some point about pulling standards you frequently use into your own expander and renaming them? Seems like they would be well beyond 75 characters!
I'm wondering if they are going to go into our personal expanders and find those longer than 75 words (and I'm sure we all have them) -- seems like an easy way to reduce the number of employees...
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)
- Termination for using expanders? - sasha1 (Views: 587, 2009-11-06, 8:55 pm)
- Expanders - Dinosaur (Views: 443, 2009-11-06, 9:16 pm)
- Expanders - Ridiculous (Views: 267, 2009-11-07, 6:27 am)
-
Same message... - Birdylove - WEs - Rolling Eyes (Views: 177, 2009-11-07, 6:32 am)
- what if... - Gonzo (Views: 47, 2009-11-08, 8:41 pm)
Latest Messages Posted
|